2003-2007 Murano - Nissan Murano - Nissan Murano Forums
Register Home Forums Active Topics Photo Gallery Arcade Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowAuto Loans
NissanMurano.org is the premier Nissan Murano Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-23-2013, 08:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Default 2003-2007 Murano

Hey guys, I am in the market for a second hand Nissan Murano
Probably 04/05 model

I see that they are going for around 10-13,000 online (seems reasonable for a second car)

Just wanna gather some feedback, which years had changes for the vehicle ?
And were there are major things to look out for with this crossover ?
///N54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-24-2013, 09:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 54
Default

Just went through the same process recently and I can say I drove an 04, then drove an 07, and the 07 felt tighter overall. Better throttle response, steering feel, suspension setup, and fit/finish tweaks. Not sure exactly when those changes were made, but the model was definitely meaningfully refined somewhere between there.
Rstolz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 09:41 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 136
Default

I would go with a first generation murano that is an 2006 or 2007 model as opposed to the 2003-2005 models due to improvements made between early production models and the 2006 models and newer models. I believe that it is not wise to buy the first three model years of any new model cars, because the automakers are still working out the bugs in the new model if they do not drop the model altogether.
__________________
2006 Nissan Murano SL AWD Silver w/ Bose"Wife's"
-But I do all the work on it
K&N air filter
K&N oil fillter 1008
Denso Power Iridium spark plugs IKH16 .4mm tip"Great MPG's and Power"
Castrol Edge 5W-30
Front Air Intake Delete
BF Goodrich Longtrail T/A tires
2004 Infiniti FX45 Silver w/Technology package"Mine"
Carguy75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 10:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
JayS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Williamsville, NY
Posts: 274
Garage
Default

The price differences really aren't that much between on 05 and 07. I'd look for an 06 or 07 just for the CVT warranty alone.
JayS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 03:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the responses, so it seems the concensus is to get something at least 2005 and hopefully maybe 2006 and 2007
Whats the fuel economy in the real world for this ?
Like how many KM (im canadian) or miles per tank ? and how big is the tank. Do you guys put premium in it ?
///N54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 03:13 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///N54 View Post
Thanks for the responses, so it seems the concensus is to get something at least 2005 and hopefully maybe 2006 and 2007
Whats the fuel economy in the real world for this ?
Like how many KM (im canadian) or miles per tank ? and how big is the tank. Do you guys put premium in it ?
I have an 09 US MO and live in Ontario. I used to use 87 octane gas but found it made my MO a bit sluggish, so I switched to 89 which the manual recommends as the bare minimum.

You might also want to run some STP complete fuel system cleaner through whatever MO you get, at least 3 or 4 times (that's 3 or 4 full ups). I did that with my 09.

You want to look at the US standard for MPG and not the Canadian numbers, here in Canada the reglatory body doesn't account for anything when asking the manufactures for their L/100km city/highway numbers unlike in the US who asks them to account for hills, the a/c being on, the windows being rolled own, etc. Europe still has the highest standards...so even the though the US numbers aren't 100% accurate they are going to be closer to what you will get than using the Canadian numbers.
smoothrunnings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 03:16 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothrunnings View Post
I have an 09 US MO and live in Ontario. I used to use 87 octane gas but found it made my MO a bit sluggish, so I switched to 89 which the manual recommends as the bare minimum.

You might also want to run some STP complete fuel system cleaner through whatever MO you get, at least 3 or 4 times (that's 3 or 4 full ups). I did that with my 09.

You want to look at the US standard for MPG and not the Canadian numbers, here in Canada the reglatory body doesn't account for anything when asking the manufactures for their L/100km city/highway numbers unlike in the US who asks them to account for hills, the a/c being on, the windows being rolled own, etc. Europe still has the highest standards...so even the though the US numbers aren't 100% accurate they are going to be closer to what you will get than using the Canadian numbers.

Ahhh, I see I see
So how much is it to fill up and generally how many km to get out of a tank ?
///N54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 04:00 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6
Default

I live in Vancouver and I have 2006 murano sl. I usually get 450-500km on full tank. This is mostly city.
bycmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.