Joined
·
216 Posts
I really like the Murano, really. I rented one for a week and it was great. It has just about every luxury feature that is available on more expensive models (save for a power rear hatch). It is roomy in the passenger areas, drives smoothly and handles smartly. Power is more than adequate and I am sold on the CVT from driving my A4 (with a similar CVT). However, I am still not 100% convinced that the cargo area is large enough for my family.
Right now I have just a 5-month old daughter. She will be graduating from her infant carrier into a convertible car seat soon, which will not fit in my A4, so I was looking for something larger. While I can fit her stroller in the side of my A4's trunk north-south, it will only fit east-west in the Murano (unless I prop it up on the back of the rear seats). With the stroller in the Murano, it seemed to have little more cargo room than my A4.
Now, I watched my neighbor pack his Volvo XC90 for a trip to Disney World with his wife and 2-year old and the back of the XC was packed full, and I know that the XC has a larger cargo area than the Murano.
Since the rear seats will stay up all of the time because I will have the child seat in the middle position (the safest place), the ability to fold the rear seats simply won't work for me.
So I started shopping for vehicles with more cargo room. I pretty much nixed any truck-based SUV because of excessive weight and poor fuel economy. I looked at the XC90, but it doesn't lease very well (I only lease my cars) and it was a good $200/mo more than a Murano. The interior of the Caddy SRX just didn't do it for me and, even with my supplier discount, it would cost me over $100/mo more than the Mo which I didn't think it was worth. The Highlander and Pilot don't have enough luxury features for me. The Touareg is a bit larger, but over $150/mo more expensive and weighs a ton (literally) more than the Murano. The MDX is a lame duck model that has a dated interior (and is more $$$ than the Mo). Just for kicks I priced out a new Tahoe, and with desirable features, the MSRP topped $45K!!
Basically, I can't find anything else that has the features and/or fuel economy of the Murano, and is even in the ball park when it comes to price. So it comes down to paying more money (which is a possibility) or going with the Murano and hoping I don't outgrow the vehicle over the next 3 years.
So, am I being silly worrying this much? Should I look for something bigger or just get the Murano and be happy?
Right now I have just a 5-month old daughter. She will be graduating from her infant carrier into a convertible car seat soon, which will not fit in my A4, so I was looking for something larger. While I can fit her stroller in the side of my A4's trunk north-south, it will only fit east-west in the Murano (unless I prop it up on the back of the rear seats). With the stroller in the Murano, it seemed to have little more cargo room than my A4.
Now, I watched my neighbor pack his Volvo XC90 for a trip to Disney World with his wife and 2-year old and the back of the XC was packed full, and I know that the XC has a larger cargo area than the Murano.
Since the rear seats will stay up all of the time because I will have the child seat in the middle position (the safest place), the ability to fold the rear seats simply won't work for me.
So I started shopping for vehicles with more cargo room. I pretty much nixed any truck-based SUV because of excessive weight and poor fuel economy. I looked at the XC90, but it doesn't lease very well (I only lease my cars) and it was a good $200/mo more than a Murano. The interior of the Caddy SRX just didn't do it for me and, even with my supplier discount, it would cost me over $100/mo more than the Mo which I didn't think it was worth. The Highlander and Pilot don't have enough luxury features for me. The Touareg is a bit larger, but over $150/mo more expensive and weighs a ton (literally) more than the Murano. The MDX is a lame duck model that has a dated interior (and is more $$$ than the Mo). Just for kicks I priced out a new Tahoe, and with desirable features, the MSRP topped $45K!!
Basically, I can't find anything else that has the features and/or fuel economy of the Murano, and is even in the ball park when it comes to price. So it comes down to paying more money (which is a possibility) or going with the Murano and hoping I don't outgrow the vehicle over the next 3 years.
So, am I being silly worrying this much? Should I look for something bigger or just get the Murano and be happy?