I had the opportunity to drive a 2005 Quest from Dallas to Ft Myers Fl. About 1300 miles.
This is the vehicle I was going to buy to replace my 1997 Chrysler Town and Country LXI in 2003.
On my short Test Ride in 2003, I determined that the Quest would be a step backward from my Chrysler, and tried out the Murano.
The rest is history.
The fact that the speedometer and tach are mounted in the middle of the car was most disconcerting.
The car was a Hertz rental unit with 10,100 miles on it. It carried Driver, passenger and <> 600 pounds of "cargo".
It looked pristine.
It was a bottom to mid range unit with power windows but cloth manual seats. The tires were well balanced and any "problems" will be discussed below.
Transmission- I don't want to knock the Nissan Transmission tho it is is not as smooth as a GM auto (One of the worlds smoothest and reliable transmissions).
Every time it shifted, there would be a slight (perhaps 2-300 Millisecond pause. This would cause the driver and passengers to rock forward a couple of inches. Then the transmission would complete it's shift and the driver and passenger would rock backwards.
Combined with the fact that the transmission was constantly shifting in and out of OD (at 75 MPH) this was most annoying. (It's hard to satisfy a CVT pilot!)
I suspect that the transmission would be considered "average" for a normal geared transmission.
I guess I like the CVT in my Murano.
Power - The car uses the same VQ engine as the Murano. However, in this vehicle, with 2 passengers and <> 600 pounds of cargo, the engine was overmatched. Of course it could have been poorly chosen transmission gearing.
It jumps off the line (superior to the Murano up to about 15-20 mPH) but then slows as the speed builds. IMO the Murano would drive by this bad boy at about 40-50 MPH.
At 70 MPH, when the accelerator is pressed, the car gasps for breath. At 70 MPH in the Murano it is still accelerating strongly. And even then you can "slap" the Murano into DS and really go.
Body integrity - When the doors close it sounds like test day at a tin factory.
The sliding doors BTW required almost super human strength to close completely. To be fair, they may have needed adjustment. I suggest that adjustment wouldn't help for long however, as the doors are flimsy.
Mileage - we averaged 23.5 MPG (On Premium gas) while on the Highway at 75MPH. My Chrysler averaged 25.2 MPG with a similar load at similar speeds.........on regular gas. (My Murano does about 24 MPG in similar trim at similar speeds.
Seats - They have to be kidding. Terrible seats. No side bolstering at all. Seats seem to be shaped incorrectly for the average driver. Very hard also.
These seats are one of the things that caught my attention in 2003. Chrysler STILL didn't have foldaway seats in 2003. OR 2004.
These fold out of the way, leaving an almost flat floor from the back of the front seats to the rear hatch.
The commercials show how quick and easily this is done. Especially the third seat.
What the commercials don't show is how it takes a weightlifter to pull the third seat out of that hole.
Poor design.
AC- OK, this was just a failure. But it was most upsetting.
Without changing anything, the AC would suddenly act like it had lost coolant, or it would blow super cold air out of the passenger side and HOT air out of the Drivers vents.
Hertz gave me a $50 credit because of the AC problem.
NVH - actually has more road noise with 10,000 miles on the tires than my Murano with 28,000 miles on the tires.
Summary - I cannot recommend this vehicle.
It is far inferior to the (old) Chrysler Mini, and by default, several others, too.
It comes very close to receiving the Homer POS award.
Homer
This is the vehicle I was going to buy to replace my 1997 Chrysler Town and Country LXI in 2003.
On my short Test Ride in 2003, I determined that the Quest would be a step backward from my Chrysler, and tried out the Murano.
The rest is history.
The fact that the speedometer and tach are mounted in the middle of the car was most disconcerting.
The car was a Hertz rental unit with 10,100 miles on it. It carried Driver, passenger and <> 600 pounds of "cargo".
It looked pristine.
It was a bottom to mid range unit with power windows but cloth manual seats. The tires were well balanced and any "problems" will be discussed below.
Transmission- I don't want to knock the Nissan Transmission tho it is is not as smooth as a GM auto (One of the worlds smoothest and reliable transmissions).
Every time it shifted, there would be a slight (perhaps 2-300 Millisecond pause. This would cause the driver and passengers to rock forward a couple of inches. Then the transmission would complete it's shift and the driver and passenger would rock backwards.
Combined with the fact that the transmission was constantly shifting in and out of OD (at 75 MPH) this was most annoying. (It's hard to satisfy a CVT pilot!)
I suspect that the transmission would be considered "average" for a normal geared transmission.
I guess I like the CVT in my Murano.
Power - The car uses the same VQ engine as the Murano. However, in this vehicle, with 2 passengers and <> 600 pounds of cargo, the engine was overmatched. Of course it could have been poorly chosen transmission gearing.
It jumps off the line (superior to the Murano up to about 15-20 mPH) but then slows as the speed builds. IMO the Murano would drive by this bad boy at about 40-50 MPH.
At 70 MPH, when the accelerator is pressed, the car gasps for breath. At 70 MPH in the Murano it is still accelerating strongly. And even then you can "slap" the Murano into DS and really go.
Body integrity - When the doors close it sounds like test day at a tin factory.
The sliding doors BTW required almost super human strength to close completely. To be fair, they may have needed adjustment. I suggest that adjustment wouldn't help for long however, as the doors are flimsy.
Mileage - we averaged 23.5 MPG (On Premium gas) while on the Highway at 75MPH. My Chrysler averaged 25.2 MPG with a similar load at similar speeds.........on regular gas. (My Murano does about 24 MPG in similar trim at similar speeds.
Seats - They have to be kidding. Terrible seats. No side bolstering at all. Seats seem to be shaped incorrectly for the average driver. Very hard also.
These seats are one of the things that caught my attention in 2003. Chrysler STILL didn't have foldaway seats in 2003. OR 2004.
These fold out of the way, leaving an almost flat floor from the back of the front seats to the rear hatch.
The commercials show how quick and easily this is done. Especially the third seat.
What the commercials don't show is how it takes a weightlifter to pull the third seat out of that hole.
Poor design.
AC- OK, this was just a failure. But it was most upsetting.
Without changing anything, the AC would suddenly act like it had lost coolant, or it would blow super cold air out of the passenger side and HOT air out of the Drivers vents.
Hertz gave me a $50 credit because of the AC problem.
NVH - actually has more road noise with 10,000 miles on the tires than my Murano with 28,000 miles on the tires.
Summary - I cannot recommend this vehicle.
It is far inferior to the (old) Chrysler Mini, and by default, several others, too.
It comes very close to receiving the Homer POS award.
Homer