Hi here again with the same oil consumption problem, still don't have a smoker, but the oil is going, so my question in used engine world, which years will fit in my 03 mo, and if anyone has done a swap anything to look out for ?
Yes.I talked to my dealer about consumption problem and mentioned i was thinking of a rebuilt engine , he said " don't rebuild it " then i went to the best engine shop in town and explained the issue, he called me two days latter and told me he had made some calls and based on what he found out and my description that even though he had full ability to do rebuild he recommend keeping the level topped up as there was probably not enough damage to warrant a complete rebuild. said he would take my money and do a perfect job, but that if it was his car he wouldn't do a build on it. I have posted the amounts prior and it has not gotten any worse over last two years, that is when i noticed and started a log book, uses about same amount since i bought it six years ago. any thoughts.
I don't buy it. If all the Muranos had low tension rings *and* that was enough to cause oil consumption in yours, *then* it would cause oil consumption in many Muranos. That's not the case. This is a very simple "if-then" proposition, and it doesn't work. Their story doesn't make any sense, and I don't believe it for a second. If Muranos have low tension oil rings, then they are designed by the manufacturer to run that way without consuming excess amounts of oil. My 07 with 76K miles on it doesn't use any significant amount of oil between 5K oil changes, and it's stock.i was told nissan has low tension rings in these motors. similar to rings found in racing cars .
I've heard that before and I don't believe it either. It's not physically possible to bore a tapered cylinder and have the piston not slap and the rings seal. Some day I may get corrected, but IMO whoever wrote that doesn't understand motors.ya that's not what i am saying, just pointing out that with some scoring from pre-cat brick being sucked through the engine the low tension rings could let a little more oil pass, got this info from here , this site.
1) If your VQ is losing/burning oil, it is NOT because of the viscosity. The problem lies in the taper of the cylinder bore. All VQ engines have a tapered bore, and on some, it is excessive, to the point where the secondary rings and oil control rings are not making full contact with the cylinder walls. During heavy deceleration, or high rpm deceleration, the vacuum in the cylinder draws oil past these rings. In a situation where you are losing 1qt every 1000 miles, you can be sure to find secondary rings that show minimal signs of wear. (since they are not in contact with the walls, why would they wear?)
Creative thinking here....yes up here we say " you miss every shot you don't take " tried vancouver but the price went up to 8k and then add in travel and accommodation which was not even practical as they needed a week to do the job. i will check seattle but can't afford to add food and lodging for a week if it is that long.