Thanks for that clarification.
I have an electrical engineering degree and a masters in math. I understand sample size, statistics, and infomatics very well.
What I say, and will continue to say, is that my own observations cannot be denied. The probability that I’m in a tiny, isolated 100% sample size, within and relative to a tiny overall sample size with the opposite trends, is statistically much smaller than the transmissions having a relatively high failure rate.
If you ignore the observations of others around you, who have no statistical predisposition to having skewed observations, and instead fall back on speculative conjecture about industry-standard fail rates (which frankly nobody here knows anything about if we’re honest), then I don’t know what to say that can help.
I stand by my observations. The CVT is problematic relative to all transmissions, and frankly relative to all car parts that I have ever heard of. The fact that it continues on and is not isolated just rams it home. I will not personally own my Murano after the warranty is up. Period. My wife’s, I expect to dump $5K at any time after the warranty is up and we lived the bad lesson so many seem to have to live through.
This topic is no different than any other fail rate topics on car forums. People want to believe they’re not next and have a warm, fuzzy feeling about their cars. On some forums, people stating the obvious are attacked (e.g, Mustangs, Civics, etc.). Ask me how I know. Im not in denial. It’s a problematic transmission and I feel that any reasonable person can agree.