Nissan Murano Forum banner
41 - 60 of 352 Posts
From the pics, seems doable (homemade shield). The shield would not have to fit all the contours, just protect the front.

From the service manual it seems like the current protection only protects from the bottom. Will Nissan replace this shield or simple put plastic in front?
 
pacmo-

Thanx for the pics.

It's hard to form an opinion on the shield from the pics. They stand out in the photos, but I would expect that once they accumulate some road grime and the shininess wears off they may be less notably. I am just concerned that they may look too "clunky", just like the center muffler (which looks like an add-on, or a design after-thought).

As long as they don't rattle, whistle, thump or contribute any noise then I might not have a problem with the install.

Since it is a voluntary recall, I wonder if the install is mandatory.

Thanx again for the pics.

-njjoe
 
What if anything will this do to the airflow under the MO. I doubt that it will improve it any since it looks somewhat blunt relative to the airflow that will hit it. Does that in turn lead to increased noise or drag?

I had anticipated something a little more streamlined. Not sure that I will be early in line to have this installed.

Anyone have any idea as to how many punctured gas tanks have been reported?
 
Before we go knocking Nissan's fuel tank shield, lets remember that this is a voluntary recall campaign and Nissan is stepping up to the plate and doing the right thing. That to me, is all I need to know to get this done to my MO as soon as the part is available at my dealership.

If you are really that concerned about the looks, then it is your choice to run the risk of fuel tank damage, however rare it may be, by not responding to the recall notice.
 
Eric L. said:
Before we go knocking Nissan's fuel tank shield, lets remember that this is a voluntary recall campaign and Nissan is stepping up to the plate and doing the right thing. That to me, is all I need to know to get this done to my MO as soon as the part is available at my dealership.

If you are really that concerned about the looks, then it is your choice to run the risk of fuel tank damage, however rare it may be, by not responding to the recall notice.
I agree! They may not look so great but when I hear "Risk of fuel tank puncture" no matter what the odds I take it seriously. The last thing I need is 21.7 gallons of premium fuel spewing out and catching fire.

pacmo
 
Also to clear up confusion, Nissan is offering two fuel tank shield kits, one is plastic and one is aluminum. The recall notice, which is now up at NHTSA, says the dealer should use whichever kit they have available.
 
zebelkhan said:
I like MightyMo's sheilds better....
No argument there. ;) He paid for his, Nissan's are free.
 
Can you just imagine the look on the mechanic's face if MightyMo left the skid plates in place and brought his MO in to have the shields installed?! :eek:

-njjoe
 
njjoe said:
Can you just imagine the look on the mechanic's face if MightyMo left the skid plates in place and brought his MO in to have the shields installed?! :eek:

-njjoe
Knowing the dealer, they would remove the hefty ones on the "Mighty MO" and install the plastic ones!
 
Looks like something that can get torn off by road debris...
 
jaak said:
Looks like something that can get torn off by road debris...
They do look a little weak. But they are strong and on there pretty good. It you were to encounter road debris large enough to tear them off, it would have also damaged the tank (if they were not there) as well as other items such as the exaust, rear diff, etc...

pacmo
 
Discussion starter · #56 ·
Hey NJJoe - you're right in that this is a "voluntary recall." But the "voluntary" part applies to Nissan doing this without NHTSA issuing an enforceable order from them to do it (i.e., the voluntary part doesn't apply to vehicle owners!). Actually, almost 100% of all recalls are "voluntary." Generally, manufacturers will fight this only for so long if they don't want to do a recall. NHTSA then has to go through formal judicial proceedings to get an enforceable order issued. Usually, when manufacturers see the handwriting on the wall, they'll cave and do the recall.

Because the recall is formal (with NHTSA assigned number, etc.), Nissan will want as high a compliance rate as possible. Especially since they have to report the results of the recall to NHTSA, who has the authority to require another recall if the return rate on the first is not high enough. If I (or anyone else) doesn't get the fix done, any subsequent problem (i.e., fuel tank puncture and attendant damage) is on my own dime.

Although I'm not crazy about adding MORE weight to my Murano and potentially reducing wind drag even more (i.e., lower fuel economy), guess I probably don't have much choice on getting this done. Oh well . . .
 
Discussion starter · #57 ·
BTW - just got off the phone with my dealer service station. They do NOT have shields in stock yet, but told me to check back in a couple of weeks. No hassles on admitting the issue or requiring a notice or anything. My service managered admitted up front that there was a recall and he'd be happy to help - just needed to get the parts in from Parts Distribution.
 
Great now I have a reason to take the MO to the dealer.

I can get the "new" plastic gas tank shield & also get my badly bent metal CVT snow scoup replaced with a new plastic one! :rolleyes:
 
Discussion starter · #59 ·
Interesting facts from NHTSA

Okay guys, its a slow morning at the office for me. So I did a little digging. Here's what I found out:

From the Summary Page of the Defects Investigation opened into the Murano fuel tank issue:

ODI HAS RECEIVED FOUR CONSUMER COMPLAINTS OF THE FUEL TANKS BEING PUNCTURED BY ROAD DEBRIS DURING NORMAL DRIVING (NON OFF-ROAD CONDITIONS) IN 2004 AND 2005 MODEL YEAR NISSAN MURANOS. THE RESULT OF EACH OF THE PUNCTURES HAS BEEN FUEL LEAKAGE AT THE PUNCTURE AND SUBSEQUENT NEED FOR FUEL TANK REPLACEMENTS. TWO OF THE CONSUMERS HAVE REPORTED PUNCTURES ON THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE FUEL TANK. ONE CONSUMER REPORTED A PUNCTURE ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE OF THE FUEL TANK. THE FOURTH CONSUMER REPORTED MULTIPLE PUNCTURES. THREE OF THE INCIDENTS OCCURRED AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. THE FOURTH INCIDENT OCCURRED AT APPROXIMATELY 15 MPH WHILE MAKING A LEFT TURN. A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION HAS BEEN OPENED TO ASSESS THE FREQUENCY, SCOPE, AND SAFETY CONSEQUENCES OF THE ALLEGED DEFECT.

In addition, in checking the "DOCUMENTS" page of the investigation, I discovered that "peer review" letters were sent to Toyota, Honda, Ford and DaimlerChrsyler where NHTSA asked about mid-size SUV production and the rate of incidents of fuel tank failures. You can see the details at this web-link:

http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/defect/results.cfm

On the left hand menu, just do a search under defects investigations. You can also find out more information about the recall itself. Here's what I was able to pull from the NHTSA website:

Image


Image


There's also a dealer service notice with step-by-step procedures for the installation of the new shields here (also pulled from the NHTSA website):

Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image
 
41 - 60 of 352 Posts